Here’s a recently completed infill project in Downtown South that initially moved forward at a surprising pace. It was approved in 2013 and has been built on a 75 foot wide lot to the south-west of 1107 Seymour, an adjacent project that was rezoned for office and non-market housing.
This project wasn’t a rezoning, and the architects were Endall Elliot (who also designed the building next door). It’s an 8-storey building with 39 condo apartments and a 2-storey house. The Urban Design Panel got to see it, and unanimously supported it.
As built the building looks pretty much what the render looked like. Downtown South is getting close to built out, with very few opportunities for further development.
Wall, the developers, have chosen to offer the units as rental, and renumbered trhe property as 1111 Seymour.
This is another project in the jigsaw puzzle of higher density industrial and commercial buildings to be built in the Mount Pleasant industrial area, It’s a four storey building with access to the roof from a fifth storey overrun, designed by Taylor Kurtz, with two floors of office over warehousing.
The roof of the building, at 5th and Manitoba, has a proposed multi-sport court (although losing the ball from there could be a hazard to traffic).
The zoning for ‘Railtown’, the Downtown Eastside industrial area around Railway Street was recently re-worked as ‘I-4’. Here’s the first project to reflect that zoning change, designed by Mallen Gowing Berzins Architecture (MGBA). Buildings can now potentially have five times the floor area of the site, and this seven storey building proposes just that, for a total of 150,000 square feet of space. It would have manufacturing uses on the first six floors; General Office uses on the sixth and seventh floors and two restaurants on the first floor.
This narrow lot has a proposal for 20 units of affordable housing to be developed by MPA Society, already based in Gastown next door to this currently vacant site. The Society works to support people with serious and persistent mental illness.
NSDA’s design for the building had to incorporate light wells for both adjacent buildings, so the site is limited to twenty units, each of 325 sq. ft. There’s a main floor amenity room overlooking the street, and a communal laundry.
The Urban Design Panel have already reviewed, and supported this innovative housing project in Mount Pleasant. The innovative aspect is to use stacked modular construction. It isn’t the first project in the city to use this approach, and there are other developments that have reused shipping containers as their modular elements, but examples are few and far between.
Ankenman Marchand have designed the 18 unit building to be constructed from factory assembled modules that will be trucked to site and then stacked over the retail unit on the lower floor. The project already has an October date for the Development Permit Board.
This project, as far as we can tell, never obtained a Development Permit. It was built by Carillion Construction for Defense Construction Canada, and the public announcement of the project (after it had already started) said the new building would cost around $31m. It allows the Jericho Garrison (in West Point Grey) to be “divested” according to a military spokesman. There’s an additional retrofit and seismic upgrade to ensure the existing heritage Seaforth Armoury building (to the west) complies with the National Building Code of Canada and Department of National Defence standards.
There’s no confirmation of who the architects were, although bidding documents suggest a consortium of The Colborne Architectural Group/AMEC Americas Limited. The project hit a rocky patch at the end of 2013 when workers with the demolition subcontractor blockaded the site for non-payment. Fortunately the design evolved from the initial idea, to a lighter colour scheme.
The first version of this project was submitted in June 2014. We noted it was a ‘remarkably bold architectural proposal’ on the northwest corner of Burrard and West 5th Avenue. The architects were Yamamoto Architecture, and the Urban Design Panel reviewed the project, and unanimously rejected the design. The proposal took liberties with the view cone in the area and was also substantially higher than guidelines suggest.
Here’s the model of the replacement from the end of 2014 – more respectful of the guidelines and the neighbourhood, while still showing some cantilevered elements. The ‘as built’ seems faithful to that design, with a little more glazing on Burrard Street than was originally suggested.